* Skip to main content * Skip to navigation * Sign up for email alerts * Contact The Lawyer team * Advertise with The Lawyer The Lawyer The Lawyer www.thelawyer.com Monday, 21 January 2013 * Sign In * Register * Cookies * Home * News * Law Firms & The Bar * Practice Areas * In-House & Public Sector * Practice Management * CPD/Events * Jobs Search the site ____________________ Search Advanced search * Home Winners in PI's 'Americanisation' 22 August 1995 * Email * Share * Comment * Save The row over selling accident victims' names for £1 a time, which sparked apoplectic attacks in the heavyweight press about 'ambulance chasing' lawyers 'Americanising' personal injury litigation, raises serious issues: how is an accident victim expected to find a competent lawyer? Are personal injury lawyers really bringing transatlantic litigation to the UK and if so, to whose benefit or detriment? The need for specialisation in personal injury is now well-recognised. The Law Society Personal Injury Panel is up and running, with 2,000 solicitors throughout the country. Accident Line has started, with an insurance scheme for conditional fees linked to membership of the panel. One cannot condone any arrangement where a solicitor buys lists of accident victims for what is little more than cold calling. But how are victims to find competent solicitors to handle accident claims? Some will be members of trade unions or related to union members and thus covered by union schemes, others will benefit from insurance arrangements or membership of motoring organisations, all of which refer claimants to competent solicitors. Others may have the sense to telephone the Law Society for a recommendation from the panel. Sadly, though many victims take a stab in the dark by going to a local high street firm which may not have the required skills or they are taken in by adverts or "£1 a go" schemes. The Law Society must do all it can to protect accident victims by publicising initiatives like the Personal Injury Panel and Accident Line arrangements. The society must tighten the rules, not by stopping advertising, but by ensuring that in key areas where the public is particularly vulnerable specialist skills can only be claimed by those who really have them. Advertising legal services has to be about giving an informed choice to the public, and if a firm advertises a particular expertise, the client is entitled to expect a reasonable level of competence in the field. The present rules simply do not give that assurance. The linked argument is that personal injury lawyers are creating a US-style "sue for anything" culture. But the truth is very different. Only a quarter of those with potential injury claims bother to bring them. Four million people suffer occupational injuries or illnesses every year. The Health & Safety Executive say that 75 per cent of them are due to failure on the part of the employer, yet only a very small proportion result in successful compensation awards. If 'Americanisation' means tacky advertising or raising the expectations of clients with hopeless and unmeritorious claims, then I do not support it. If, however, it means that lawyers are helping people to become more aware of their rights, and accident victims are willing to take action to enforce those rights, then I am all for it. If 'Americanisation' means developing access to justice through easier procedures, wider funding options and more skilled practitioners, then I am all for that too. I am also in favour of using US forensic techniques, such as demonstrative evidence to ensure that a judge when considering an award of damages to a child road accident victim, for example, can fully appreciate the impact of the accident on that victim's life. If 'Americanisation' means these real benefits, and I believe it does, we need to look at just who are the winners and losers. The real winners are the victims, bringing claims for compensation which are presently neglected and recovering ever-improving damages, despite the limitations of our system. The losers are insurance firms, which have had it too much their own way for too long, and which now find themselves paying justified damages to accident victims, on claims which previously may never have been brought. Andrew Dismore is a solicitor with Russell Jones & Walker and chair of the Association of Personal Injuries Lawyers. Tweet Have your say Please do not complete the following form field for security reasons. ____________________ ____________________ Name Mandatory ____________________ E-mail Mandatory ____________________ Comment Mandatory ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ Post as Mandatory (_) Anonymously (_) Display name [_] I have read and agree to the terms and conditions Send * Email * Share * Comment * Save Follow The Lawyer on Twitter Most popular * CMS launches redundancy consultation with 40 jobs at risk * Trowers hits out at exiting partners as Addleshaws launches in Oman * Half of partners think they're underpaid, BDO study finds * Houston's Bracewell & Giuliani raids Simmons to kickstart London practice * Follett Stock managing partner accused of bullying female solicitor Most commented * Clydes took £23m loan to fund post-merger office move * Trowers hits out at exiting partners as Addleshaws launches in Oman * Half of partners think they're underpaid, BDO study finds * Ex-Fried Frank staffer accused of stealing $376,000 worth of ink * Houston's Bracewell & Giuliani raids Simmons to kickstart London practice Most emailed * Houston's Bracewell & Giuliani raids Simmons to kickstart London practice * Fee radical * Barclays panel delayed as bank moves away from biennial reviews * Norton Rose moots shifting Middle East arm to US LLP in wake of Fulbright merger * SNR Denton partner quits to launch City arm for US firm Sullivan & Worcester My saved stories (Empty) * You have no saved stories Save this article * Blogs * Directory * UK 200 * Briefings * Students/Lawyer 2B * Comments * Education & Training * Thought Leaders * Transatlantic Elite 2012 Regions * Asia & Australasia * Europe * Middle East & Africa * Offshore * UK * US & The Americas Practice Areas * Banking / Finance * Corporate / Commercial * Employment * Insurance / Reinsurance * IP, Technology and Media * Litigation / Dispute Resolution * Private Client * Projects and Infrastructure * Public / Regulatory * Real Estate Awards * The Lawyer Workplace & Diversity Awards * The Lawyer Awards Summits & Conferences * The Lawyer Strategy Summit * The Lawyer European Conference & Awards The Lawyer Supplements * The Lawyer Euro 100 * The Lawyer UK200 * The Lawyer Hot 100 * Forward Features List * The Lawyer Business Technology Guide Special Supplements * Wealth: How to manage it Other * Work Life Quiz * Move on up * Clarifications Subscribe to the print edition DELIVERED TO YOUR DOOR EVERY MONDAY The Lawyer News direct to you The latest legal news, opinion, analysis, jobs and events sent direct to your in-box. * Lawyer News Daily * The Lawyer in New York * Lawyer Litigation Weekly * Public Sector Monthly * Lawyer Offshore Monthly * Job Updates * CPD/Event Updates Blackberry Phone Advertise with The Lawyer "After an extensive web and print advertising campaign both the successful hire and runner up were down to response from The Lawyer" The Lawyer products * RSS Feeds * Subscribe to Magazine * Privacy Statement * Terms & Conditions * Previous Issues * Site Map * Contact Us * Mobile Site DCSIMG The Lawyer Group is a division of Centaur Media plc Centaur Media plc. Registered No 4948078 England. Registered Office 79 Wells Street, London W1T 3QN Site powered by Webvision * © Copyright 1994 - 2012 Centaur Media plc