The Americanisation of Turkey | openDemocracy Home About Team Our Supporters Forum Donate Submit an article Contact Login | Signup × close “I will say it now: beware of my partisanship, my mistakes of fact, and the distortion inevitably caused by my having seen only one corner of events.” - George Orwell, Homage to Catalonia , 1938 View What links here The Americanisation of Turkey Dimitar Bechev 18 March 2012 Subjects: International politics Democracy and government Turkey middle east europe democracy & power the future of turkey future of europe Turkey's international profile and domestic politics have long been oriented towards the European Union. Now, both the Arab awakening and the internal momentum of AKP rule are pushing Ankara closer to the United States, says Dimitar Bechev. There was a time when people in Turkey wishfully called their country küçük Amerika ("the little America"). The phrase reflected a strong, even intimate relationship between the two countries. During the cold-war years, Turkey's centre-right leaders - from Adnan Menderes in the 1950s to Turgut Özal in the 1980s - extolled the virtues of the American dream to a receptive public; the Nato alliance was the alpha and omega of Ankara’s security doctrine; Turkey's elite sent its offspring to colleges across the United States; and Turkish audiences lapped up the latest pop-culture imports such as the TV soap Dallas . Then, for much of the two subsequent decades, it looked as if Turkey was following a predominantly European path. It has turned out, however, that this was but a detour. In post-Kemalist Turkey, the earlier American vision is coming to full fruition. Europe’s evident failure to accomplish its transformative mission means that Turkish politics is coming under the sway, not of Europeanisation but of Americanisation. There are many manifestations of the trend. Perhaps the clearest is Turkey's foreign relations. Before the Arab spring of 2011, Turkey had confidently pursued what it called a "zero-problems" regional approach (its own version of Brussels's "European neighbourhood policy" that promotes functional integration with states on the European Union's periphery). But the violent upheavals in Libya and Syria effectively derailed the "zero-problems" principle. Instead, the region's new turmoil reinforced Ankara's bonds with Washington as they forged a common front on the Syrian crisis (while agreeing to disagree on Israel). Turkey shifted towards projecting the notion of a "Turkish model" as something the awakened Arabs could emulate - whose traces of a "freedom agenda" had resemblances to the outlook of neocons in the George W Bush administration. Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, has even spoken of a "golden era" in US-Turkish relations (which suggests she may be unaware of how close the states were in the 1950s). The contrast with Europe is stark, as Turkey’s relations with EU heavyweights such as France and Germany over its stalled membership negotiations have become poisoned. From Ankara's perspective, the shift towards Washington is natural: after all, what security assets does crisis-stricken Europe have to help Turkey fend off threats emanating from an imploding Syria, an expansionist Iran or an unstable Iraq? A domestic dynamic But the connection runs much deeper than the convergence of strategic interests at a critical juncture - for Turkey is also Americanising domestically. The ruling Justice & Development Party (AKP) may have responded to the weakening of the EU's reformist pressure by succumbing further to an authoritarian temptation in the wake of its third successive electoral victory in June 2011. But even before then, the accommodation of religious conservatism that underpins the AKP's democratic imaginaire closely mirrors a US-style framework while being at increasing variance with Europe’s post-Christian polities. Turkey's prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his followers, in seeking to bolster the case for Turkey’s accession to the EU, used to cite European-style Christian democracy as a source of inspiration for their moderate form of Islamic politics. In 2012, however, the AKP's social-conservative line on "family values" or the teaching of Darwinian evolution in schools if far more in harmony with attitudes in America’s "red" (Republican) states than in European metropoles. Turkey has its own "culture wars" which are surely intelligible to the median US citizen. A controversy over proposed reforms that would introduce a middle-school level for 10-14 year-olds who can be enrolled in an imam hatip (religious institution) or be taught at home is a case in point. The AKP maintains that this would broaden girls' access to schooling; critics see it as perpetuating social conservatism. The influential religious thinker Fethullah Gülen may have a conflictual relationship with Erdoğan, but he remains an influential fellow-traveller of the AKP - and significantly, he resides in Pennsylvania. None other than the New York Times portrayed the "Gülenists" as "the Islamic equivalent of Christian movements appealing to business and the professions." Both Gülen's movement and the pious entrepreneurs supporting the AKP have embraced the fusion of market-friendly (or neo-liberal) economics and God once popularised by Turgut Özal, perhaps Turkey’s most distinguished Americaniser. Some critics would argue that the religious worldview shared by the AKP and the Gülenists dismisses social rights and redistribution and sees welfare (again similarly to US conservatives) in paternalistic terms as a matter of charity, though in fairness social reforms in key areas such as healthcare have greatly expanded opportunities for Turkey's lower-income groups. In institutional terms, the AKP’s decade-long ascendancy has resulted in a transition from coalition rule to majoritarian politics. The party governs alone, unimpeded either by the need to share power with other political forces (as its predecessors in the 1990s faced) or by Turkey's so-called "deep state". The measures sanctioned by the constitutional referendum of 2010 is a prime example of how the AKP's majoritarianism works: it embodied the growing power of a definition of democracy as governing by the will of the (conservative) majority rather than involving coalition-building, sharing power, reassuring and co-opting sceptical minorities. Erdoğan’s intermittent calls to replace the parliamentary regime with presidential rule (with the three-term prime minister presumably at the helm) charts the next step. The inevitable result is to polarise public opinion and raise concerns that a Turkish form of "Putinisation" may be in prospect. Whether such concerns are warranted or overblown, it is certain that a strong presidency at the heart of Turkey's decision-making system would inaugurate a winner-takes-all political model far removed from the consensual modes of government characteristic of continental Europe. Here is a departure from United States norms, since US presidentialism is part of a functioning checks-and-balances system that includes a powerful legislature and assertive judiciary. This, however, is one area where the US, often blamed for its arrogance, has no particular mechanism to export its constitutional acquis, in contrast with the EU's reliance on membership conditionality. An international lodestar But if Turkey is embracing Americanisation rather than Europeanisation, could this process provide a (better) answer to Turkey's burning questions of citizenship and national identity? Again, the European Union long thought that it had the competence and leverage to make a difference in Turkey. But it now appears that Brussels’s standards tended to reinforce Turkey's post-1920s Kemalist order, which was already informed by the French republican ideal of a single and indivisible political community (and often cast, as also in Germany and much of central and eastern Europe, in exclusively ethno-cultural terms). The retreat of EU influence in Turkey increasingly makes the alternative to Kemalism not one of EU-inspired minority rights, let alone ethnic power-sharing as demanded by Kurdish nationalists, but rather the AKP brand of identity politics which (unlike Kemalism) recognises the multiplicity of ethnic identities while embracing nationalism and the cult of the state. Here, ( Sunni ) Islam is the overarching, supra-ethnic glue that reconciles the commitment to a strong, sovereign and fiercely patriotic Turkey with cultural-linguistic particularisms. Again, this is a pattern recognisable in the US. Moreover, the AKP’s nationalism - in contrast to the insular and xenophobic nationalisms of today's Europe - resembles the US's in being defined by a sort of mission civilisatrice in the Arab world, which draws inspiration from the glorious Ottoman era. Hence, Turkey's aforementioned shift from "zero problems" to a "freedom agenda" in the middle east. True, this effort to recast nationhood along the mildly Islamist worldview to which Turkey’s current rulers subscribe is but a "project in the making", and it is contested from multiple quarters, not least by nationalist Kurds. Its chances of completion hinge on the possibility that civic norms can be enshrined as the core of citizenship. And as long as the new civilian constitution promised by the authorities is nowhere in sight, the project remains out of sync with crude political realities. So there are also obstacles to Turkey's Americanisation. Turkey’s new establishment has very few knee-jerk Americanophiles (similar to the old secular one, whose attitude to the US was highly instrumental). Turkey's public opinion has traditionally been, as elsewhere in southern Europe, a hotbed of anti-Americanism. The German Marshall Fund’s "transatlantic trends" poll in 2011 finds out that 62% of Turks hold negative views of the US, the highest percentage of all countries surveyed. There is no causal relationship between Turkey’s internal Americanisation and the country’s behaviour vis-à-vis the US, which is essentially a balancing act between the pursuit of security in a turbulent environment and the quest for autonomy. The EU remains by far the most important trade and investment partner for Turkey, even if membership talks have ground to a halt. If the extensive human links between the two are factored in, it becomes clear that the union will remain the biggest external stakeholder in Turkey’s internal transformation for the foreseeable future - whatever the weather. It is also true, however, that the US offers a more intelligible and eye-catching model for a country and society that views itself as rising and believes tomorrow will be better than today. Neither the Europe of supranational institutions and liberal values nor the populist Europe of Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen is a credible or attractive competitor. Europhilia seems to survive in Turkey only in a handful of enclaves in downtown Istanbul and along the Aegean and Mediterranean coasts - as well as in Anatolia’s farthest corners inhabited by Kurds. The majority of Turks, having cast in their lot with the AKP, watch Europe’s eurozone crisis with Schadenfreude . Europe's loss of symbolic capital in Turkey is a significant development in a longer chain of events. The Tanzimat reforms of the 19th century sought to transplant European modernity onto Ottoman soil. The Kemalists’ quest to bring "contemporary civilisation" to Turkey was equally informed by Eurocentric ideas. To a great degree, Turkey's semi-integration into the EU (even without full membership) has made the country increasingly prosperous and, despite more recent backsliding, more democratic. But it is by looking to America rather than Europe that the new Turkey might obtain a clearer sense of direction. View the discussion thread. Related Articles The AKP years in Turkey: the third stage Gunes Murat Tezcur Turkey’s crisis and the European Union George Schöpflin Turkey and Ergenekon: from farce to tragedy Bill Park Turkey’s “Islamic reform”: roots and reality Mustafa Akyol Ergenekon: power and democracy in Turkey Bill Park Turkey’s risk, Europe’s role openDemocracy Turkey’s election, and democracy's shadow Gareth Jenkins Turkey’s referendum: a democratic dynamic Gunes Murat Tezcur Turkey in transition: reality and image Gunes Murat Tezcur Turkey’s clash of values: memo to Europe Cem Özdemir Ergenekon: Turkey's military-political contest Bill Park Turkey’s election, and democracy's shadow Gareth Jenkins Turkey and the Kurds: politics and military action Hasan Turunc Ergenekon: Turkey’s “deep state” in the light Bill Park Turkey and Europe: a shifting axis Katinka Barysch Turkey: vibrant democracy vs majority rule Bill Park Turkey's political opening Gunes Murat Tezcur Turkey's political-emotional transition Carsten Wieland Turkey 's home truths Elif Shafak Turkey and Israel: ends and beginnings Kerem Oktem Turkey's “passive revolution” and democracy Kerem Oktem Arab revolutions, Turkey’s dilemmas: zero chance for "zero problems" Ivan Krastev Read On European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) Dimitar Bechev, ed., What Does Turkey Think (ECFR, June 2011) Centre for Liberal Strategies , Sofia Kerem Oktem, Angry Nation: Turkey since 1989 (Zed Books, 2010) Turkish election 2011 Turkey: Ending the PKK Insurgency )International Crisis Group, 20 September 2011) Gareth Jenkins Political Islam in Turkey: Running West, Heading East? (Palgrave, 2008) Changing Turkey... Erik J Zürcher, Turkey: A Modern History (IB Tauris, 2004) The Turkey Analyst Cihan Tugal, Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism (Stanford University Press, 2009) Celia J Kerslake, Kerem Oktem & Philip Robins, eds., Turkey's Engagement with Modernity (Palgrave, 2010) More On Dimitar Bechev is senior research fellow and head of the Sofia office of the European Council on Foreign Relations . He is editor of What Does Turkey Think (ECFR, June 2011), a collection of essays by Turkish analysts, policymakers and academics exploring the country’s rapid domestic transformation and dynamic foreign policy This article is published under a Creative Commons licence. If you have any queries about republishing please contact us . Please check individual images for licensing details. Stay Informed Sign-up for a free weekly email Women and the 'Arab spring' Fear and fury: women and post-revolutionary violence Deniz Kandiyoti Egypt: the Islamization of state policy Mariz Tadros A problematic discourse: who speaks for Arab women? Ala'a Shehabi More Democratic Wealth Revolutionary France and the social republic that never was Vincent Bourdeau Civic Republicanism: a North Star for hard times Jose Luis Marti A democratic case for the free market? Stuart White , Martin O'Neill and Thad Williamson More M23 in Goma: who's resourcing the conflict? Discussions in Kampala: another political farce GJ Les assises de Kampala: une autre farce politique GJ La prise de Goma et la prolifération de négociations Kateo More Best of oDRussia Window on the Middle East This week's window on the Middle East - January 21, 2013 Arab Awakening More openDemocracy on Facebook Most Popular Most Read Discussed Top Ten Drug War Stories of 2012 Phillip Smith Egypt: the Islamization of state policy Mariz Tadros Fear and fury: women and post-revolutionary violence Deniz Kandiyoti Drug Policy Alliance's Top Stories of 2012 Charles Shaw Discussions in Kampala: another political farce GJ Popular Threads Powered by Disqus Our Authors Columnists Full List Elsewhere Dan Hancox Revel, Riot and Rebellion Martin Rose Bliss Was It in that Dawn to Be Next Door Vron Ware Up in Arms Jim Gabour Sunday Comics James Warner Standing Perpendicular, as books do Markha Valenta Inter Alia: religion, politics, culture Paul Rogers on Global security Mary Kaldor on Human security See an alphabetical list of openDemocracy's authors Kanishk Tharoor: India, don't kowtow to China Faisal Devji: Can sufism defuse terrorism? Andreas Whittam Smith: Seven ways we could reform our broken political system Guardian Review: Lost and Found by Susan Richards Partners in translation User login Log in using OpenID: What is OpenID? Username or e-mail: * Password: * Log in using OpenID Cancel OpenID login Create new account Request new password Secondary links Privacy Licensing & Syndication Advertise Media Inquiries Vacancies RSS Feed openDemocracy Ltd, The Print House, 18 Ashwin Street, London, E8 3DL. Tel: +44 (0) 207 193 0676 openDemocracy openDemocracy X openDemocracy publishes high quality news analysis, debates and blogs about the world and the way we govern ourselves. More... Notes from the Editor-in-Chief Become a member | Week in 400 words | About the new site | Submit an article | Contact us Editor's Pick: The new Egyptian constitution: an initial assessment of its merits and flaws Zaid Al Ali Austerity, corporate tax evasion and human rights: why the anti-austerity movement needs some Lagarde lists of our own Peter Rossman Is Greece a racist state? Iannis Carras Best of the rest: Arab Awakening | Can Europe Make it? | Drug and Criminal Justice Policy Forum | OurBeeb OurKingdom OurKingdom X About us OurKingdom works to investigate and illuminate the crisis of democracy in Britain and analyse how its failings can be redressed. We encourage original debate untrammelled by party political loyalties. We ask how we as citizens can secure liberty, human rights, self-government and real democracy. ...more on OurKingdom Links Team | Contact | Submit an Article Debates OurBeeb | G4S: Securing whose world? | Uneconomics | Pick of the debates: Democratic Wealth: building a citizens' economy , edited by Stuart White , uses republican theory to explore ideas around how to democratise the economy. Co-hosted with Politics in Spires , a blog sponsored by the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. oD Russia oD Russia X openDemocracy Russia is a thoughtful platform for all those concerned about the future of the post-Soviet world. We publish indepth analysis, comment and reportage on the region — from politics and economics through to ecology and culture Partners Polit.Ru | Openspace.ru | Levada Center | Ukraine Analysis | Valdai Discussion Club Topics & debates Conflict | Culture | Euro2012 | Elections | Environment | Foreign | History | Human rights | Justice | Media | Politics | ProjectID | Religion | Regions | Russian rights at the crossroads | Stories you weren't meant to hear | USSR 20 Countries Armenia | Azerbaijan | Belarus | Georgia | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Moldova | Russia | Tajikistan | Turkmenistan | Ukraine | Uzbekistan Latest articles on oDRussia Russia and China: aligned after all? Thomas Koenig The fable of the eagle, the dragon and the bear Pavel Salin Life on the Chinese border: Russia's Far East Olesya Gerasimenko The rise and fall of China-watching in Russia Alexander Gabuyev Russia-China relations: fantasies and reality Ben Judah 50.50 50.50 X Recent articles on 50.50 Gender wars: women redefining customs as crimes Ruth Rosen Of rights and risks: are women’s human rights in jeopardy? Maxine Molyneux A French debate on prostitution Valeria Costa-Kostritsky Fear and fury: women and post-revolutionary violence Deniz Kandiyoti 50.50 Dialogues About 50.50 50.50 is openDemocracy's section dedicated to exploring issues of gender equality and social justice at the global level. We are committed to promoting human rights and inclusive democracy through dialogue and debate. But a global debate without the female half of humanity is neither global nor democratic. With this in mind, 50.50 publishes women's analysis, insight and views on current affairs. openIndia openIndia X Plans for a new South Asia Section openIndia is no longer actively edited, however openDemocracy is developing plans for a South Asian section with the aim of building the views, arguments, energy, originality and democratic spirit of the region across the whole of openDemocracy. If you're interested in supporting this initiative through funding or editorial activities please email info@opendemocracy.net openIndia authors Articles by Rajeev Bhargava Articles by Tani Bhargava Articles by N Jayaram Articles by Kanishk Tharoor South Asian coverage on openDemocracy Bangladesh | Bhutan | Sri Lanka | Maldives | Nepal | Pakistan Latest stories from openIndia Beyond the politics of representation: the political economy of indigenous art in postcolonial India Rashmi Varma Yes to ending violence against women, but no to the ‘zero tolerance’ route Vijay Nagaraj At the root of rape is language Angshukanta Chakraborty More Spread the word Spread the word X Spread the word is a brand new section of openDemocracy's not-for-profit web platform. This space is for other not-for-profit organisations of all kinds to publicise your activities and spread the exchange of ideas. You will be able to link to all your publications, and events anywhere in the world. You will have your own openDemocracy page and all new announcements will be ticker-taped to our front page. This organisation subscription is available for a modest annual fee, dependent on the size of your organisation. Please contact Jonathan Bowles at supporters@opendemocracy.net if you are interested in joining. If you're interested in developing editorial projects on openDemocracy, please see our Editorial partnerships page We are grateful to the following organisations for their support in developing this initiative: Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre Rockefeller Brothers Fund openSecurity openSecurity X Editors' pick The EU's Nobel Peace Prize DAN SMITH Neoliberalism in the American military and its impact on civilians JENNIFER MITTELSTADT The collapse of Transitional Justice MLADEN OSTOJIC openSecurity Debates Peacebuilding: southern perspectives | Beyond enemy images | Security sector reform openSecurity provides a point of interaction between the relatively closed group of people who can be said to have influence on the course of security policy, and the people in whose name they act. openSecurity on Twitter Sign up for a weekly email roundup from oS openEconomy openEconomy X openDemocracy brings you open-minded economics with a democratic perspective We're reading: Litquake » James Warner: An excess of joie de vivre Oct. 06, 2012 Silverman spreads an addiction ... A numerical habit that’s hard to kick - FT.com Oct. 04, 2012 EUobserver.com / Political Affairs / Back the EU or risk isolation, Poland warns UK Oct. 02, 2012 Excellent @gideonrachman on democracy and € crisis ... surely soltn is EU-level democracy Sep. 11, 2012 David Blanchflower: Osborne's support has drained away - David Blanchflower - Business Comment - The Independent Sep. 10, 2012 Latest stories from openEconomy Should we worry about global quasi-constitutionalization? Grahame Thompson Norman Tebbit exchange with John Mills - how to fix Britain's industry John Mills More Arab Awakening Arab Awakening X In the months following the start of the Arab Revolutions, articles and analysis poured into openDemocracy from contributors across the Middle East and Europe. Gradually, the impact of Tahrir Square began to extend well beyond the Middle East as democratic inspiration travelled from east to west. Arab Awakening tries to capture that inspiration and use it to help us read a rapidly changing world. "As students of politics is it is vital to study the power of imagination." -Professor Charles Tripp, SOAS Debates Columnists | This week's window on the Middle East Categories: | Revolution | Violent transitions | Constitutional reform | Spring of the 'others' | Geopolitics Countries: | Algeria | Bahrain | Egypt | Iraq | Israel | Jordan | Kuwait | Lebanon | Libya | Mauritania | Morocco | Oman | Palestine | Qatar | Saudi Arabia | Sudan | Syria | Tunisia | UAE | Yemen OurBeeb OurBeeb X Running May-October 2012 as an independent section of openDemocracy, OurBeeb is a digital challenge to the old order, seeking to make the BBC's next Director General truly accountable to the public, and debate the future of our BBC. This is a critical time for public service broadcasting, and the challenges of massive cuts and rapid technological change must be addressed head on. Follow OurBeeb OurBeeb weekly newsletter @our_Beeb Funded by 95% of British homes via the licence fee, the BBC belongs to the people, not the government. ourBeeb is independent, non-partisan, and aims to return the discussion about Britain's most important cultural institution to the people.