Fichier de travail (INPUT) : ./DUMP-TEXT/1/35-utf8.txt

Encodage utilisé (INPUT) : UTF-8

Forme recherchée : ([Pp]eine de mort)|([Pp]eine capitale)|([Dd]eath penalty)|([Cc]apital punishment)|死刑

• Ligne n°49 : Home > Opinion > The Debate Over the Death Penalty Hasn't Changed in
Ligne n°50 : Decades ...


• Ligne n°54 : Why the debate over the death penalty is the same today as it was in the
Ligne n°55 : 1970s ...

Ligne n°66 : ... more than four decades. In "A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection
• Ligne n°67 : of Capital Punishment in America," Evan J. Mandery, a professor at John
Ligne n°68 : Jay College of Criminal Justice and former capital defense attorney, ...

Ligne n°71 : ... U.S. News about the Supreme Court's controversial rulings, how they've
• Ligne n°72 : impacted the application of the death penalty today and what may change
Ligne n°73 : in the future. Excerpts: ...


• Ligne n°75 : Has the death penalty always been legal in America?

Ligne n°77 : ... There was a four-year period between 1972 and 1976, when a Supreme
• Ligne n°78 : Court decision had the practical effect of ending the death penalty in
Ligne n°79 : the United States. ...

Ligne n°85 : ... first time it had ever been made, that the Constitution was an evolving
• Ligne n°86 : document and that the death penalty was a cruel and unusual punishment.
Ligne n°87 : Until the early 1960s, with one exception, nobody had argued that the ...

Ligne n°87 : ... Until the early 1960s, with one exception, nobody had argued that the
• Ligne n°88 : death penalty was unconstitutional. It was not debated. Thereafter, a
Ligne n°89 : band of lawyers at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund began a litigation ...

Ligne n°91 : ... incredible 10-year period – incredible, whatever your views on the
• Ligne n°92 : death penalty are – a suspension of executions in the United States.
Ligne n°93 : And they believed that by tying up the court with legal challenges and ...


• Ligne n°101 : Why did the court reverse its 1972 decision on the death penalty?

Ligne n°106 : ... complete reversal in sentiment, it's not technically a legal reversal,
• Ligne n°107 : since in 1972 the court did not say the death penalty was
Ligne n°108 : unconstitutional in all cases. Even though it didn't say that, ...

Ligne n°109 : ... everybody, including everybody on the court, believed that Furman v.
• Ligne n°110 : Georgia meant the end of the death penalty in the United States.

Ligne n°115 : ... why the backlash occurred; I'll offer mine. I think it's tied up not
• Ligne n°116 : just in the sentiment about capital punishment, but as a reaction to
Ligne n°117 : other court decisions that were perceived as overreaching – notably, ...

Ligne n°121 : ... vulnerable, whereas the civil rights decisions were not. So states
• Ligne n°122 : responded either by making the death penalty mandatory [for murder and
Ligne n°123 : rape] or by attempting to curtail its arbitrariness. ...

Ligne n°127 : ... A huge impact. Even though [Justice] Potter Stewart was a moral
• Ligne n°128 : opponent of capital punishment, he said the problem was that it was too
Ligne n°129 : random. And so states and people acted as if the problem with [the] ...

Ligne n°129 : ... random. And so states and people acted as if the problem with [the]
• Ligne n°130 : death penalty was its arbitrariness. And in 1976, the court said that
Ligne n°131 : you can't have [a] mandatory death penalty, and a nonarbitrary death ...

Ligne n°130 : ... death penalty was its arbitrariness. And in 1976, the court said that
• Ligne n°131 : you can't have [a] mandatory death penalty, and a nonarbitrary death
Ligne n°132 : penalty is okay. And for 37 years, states and the Supreme Court have ...

Ligne n°133 : ... been engaged in an exercise of trying to work out and determine what a
• Ligne n°134 : nonarbitrary death penalty law is. And it's, to say the least, a very
Ligne n°135 : fraught enterprise. ...

Ligne n°143 : ... weed it out." Also, what I'm trying to do is more than just tell the
• Ligne n°144 : story of the death penalty, [but also to show] how the Supreme Court
Ligne n°145 : works. And there's no simple theory that explains how this case, and I ...

Ligne n°175 : ... prison sentences,
• Ligne n°176 : death penalty