Search Search The rise of artificial intelligence risks making us all redundant AI systems are being designed for supermarkets which allow customers to choose their shopping and exit without going to a checkout.
 Soon, robots will be stacking the shelves and running the entire show.
 No wonder unions are worried Click to follow Independent Voices Engineers in South Korea test a four-metre-tall humanoid manned robot dubbed Method-2 AFP At the start of a new year, what is there to look forward to?
 According to predictions from think tanks and tech experts, advances in automation and artificial intelligence will threaten the jobs of millions of workers.
 The CEO of one company, Capgemini, goes further, predicting that AI will be one of the key factors dividing society into the haves and have-nots, with highly skilled engineers at the one end of the spectrum and low-paid unqualified worker drones at the other, with nothing in between.
 There will be massive redundancies, for sure.
 Is it time to rethink the welfare system and pay everyone a minimum living wage whether they work or not?
 That proposal, known as a "universal basic income" is being trialled in Finland but was rejected in a referendum in Switzerland last June.
 Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg is investing heavily in developing AI.
 He recently released a corny "seasonal message" featuring his latest project, a robot butler named Jarvis.
 We don’t see Jarvis, voiced by Morgan Freeman, but the message is absolutely plain: this is not a bit of fun, but the unveiling of a plan for our future, a future which tech companies are battling to capitalise on.
 Stephen Hawking has a terrifying warning about artificial intelligence Zuckerberg has spent more than 100 hours programming Jarvis so that it can switch on his household gadgets, his music system and even help his small daughter learn Mandarin.
 It responds to voice commands issued from a phone, even offering him a clean grey T-shirt in the morning.
 Jarvis is also a gatekeeper, deciding who may or may not enter the Zuckerberg home.
 This cutesy video is surely designed to deflect attention from Facebook’s recent woes, including failing to curb fake news reports which critics reckon had a devastating impact on the result of the US presidential election.
 Facebook stands accused of failing to monitor the material it disseminates, consistently claiming freedom of speech by default, allowing lies and blatant propaganda the same platform as real news stories.
 Even the Pope has now decreed that publishing fake news is a sin.
 Britain is allowing working families to slide into poverty The development of a faceless, featureless robot is ominous; when his daughter Max wakes up, surely she would prefer a cuddle from a human being rather than a po-faced lesson from a non-person?
 By fostering the illusion that Jarvis is sociable and has a use beyond the purely functional in a small family unit, Zuckerberg is preparing the ground to present AI as something new and desirable, rather than the ultimate threat to our livelihoods.
 If he develops devices like Jarvis on a commercial basis, will it give his company direct access into our homes, whisking away what little privacy we may have left?
 And if this use of AI relies on programmes derived from our speech patterns, should we hand those over to a third party?
 And, given that we already spend far too long staring at screens, and the time we interact with other people is declining and loneliness increasing, can introducing robots into our personal lives be a good thing?
 Google and Amazon are already selling devices which can perform simple tasks, as well as developing rival driverless cars.
 AI systems are being designed for supermarkets which allow customers to choose their shopping and exit without going to a checkout.
 Soon, robots will be stacking the shelves and running the entire show.
 No wonder unions are worried.
 As for driverless cars, what are the ethics involved in deciding how they should respond to obstacles in their path?
 How do they differentiate a dead pheasant or a deer from a person who may have fallen down?
 And, if driverless cars are easily identifiable, will they spawn a new kind of road rage – one directed at trying to provoke a response from the robots taking over our lives?
 In pictures: Artificial intelligence through history In pictures: Artificial intelligence through history Boston Dynamics describes itself as 'building dynamic robots and software for human simulation'.
 It has created robots for DARPA, the US' military research company Google has been using similar technology to build self-driving cars, and has been pushing for legislation to allow them on the roads The DARPA Urban Challenge, set up by the US Department of Defense, challenges driverless cars to navigate a 60 mile course in an urban environment that simulates guerilla warfare Deep Blue, a computer created by IBM, won a match against world champion Garry Kasparov in 1997.
 The computer could evaluate 200 million positions per second, and Kasparov accused it of cheating after the match was finished Another computer created by IBM, Watson, beat two champions of US TV series Jeopardy at their own game in 2011 Apple's virtual assistant for iPhone, Siri, uses artificial intelligence technology to anticipate users' needs and give cheeky reactions Xbox's Kinect uses artificial intelligence to predict where players are likely to go, an track their movement more accurately Fans of AI say driverless cars will reduce deaths on the roads, and represent the biggest change in our lives since motor cars replaced horses a century ago.
 Really?
 Are we powerless to stop the rapid roll-out of AI?
 One of my favourite films as a student was Jean-Luc Godard’s Alphaville, in which Paris shot in atmospheric black and white is Alphaville, a city controlled by a powerful computer dubbed Alpha 60.
 Emotion is forbidden and anyone who deviates from accepted behaviour is terminated by female assassins.
 Has a film ever seemed more prescient?
 When Mark Zuckerberg tells us Jarvis is the start of something, be very scared.
 The only butler I want at chez JSP will have blood in his or her veins and be capable of questioning my more pretentious requests.
 To be honest, if I could have one gift for 2017, if would be a few hours a week from a real butler.
 Human beings make much better companions.
 Comments Most Popular Sponsored Features Video We use cookies to enhance your visit to our site and to bring you advertisements that might interest you.
 Read our Privacy and Cookie Policies to find out more.
 We've noticed that you are using an ad blocker.
 Advertising helps fund our journalism and keep it truly independent.
 It helps to build our international editorial team, from war correspondents to investigative reporters, commentators to critics.
 Click here to view instructions on how to disable your ad blocker, and help us to keep providing you with free-thinking journalism - for free.
 Thank you for your support.
 How to disable your ad blocker for independent.
co.
uk Adblock / Adblock Plus address bar.
 for the current website you are on.
 If you are in Firefox click "disable on independent.
co.
uk".
 Firefox Tracking Protection cause the adblock notice to show.
 It can be temporarily disabled by clicking the "shield" icon in the address bar.
 Ghostery Trusted Site list.
 whitelisted".
 uBlock and its state will be remembered next time you visit the web site.
 Thank you for supporting independent.
co.
uk