Nuke Pro: Herd Immunity: Collective Unconscious Programming of T-Cells, And The Sweden Discussion Exposing Truth - Sign up as a Follower Pages Please share far and wide!
Search This Blog Wednesday, October 7, 2020 Herd Immunity: Collective Unconscious Programming of T-Cells, And The Sweden Discussion stock here: Maybe it was April this year 2020, when I "discovered" that populations never get anywhere near to the low ball herd immunity level of 60%, Fauci would have you believe 80% (unless you have a vaccine).
And yet the corona-viruses fizzle out, never come back except for a very localized flare up.
By July, the epidemic wave in Sweden was rolling away, and even the lockdown-loving New York Times had to admit that Sweden was "in significantly better condition than the United States."
Today, by all appearances, Sweden has reached a high level of herd immunity.
We were told by the likes of Anthony Fauci that natural herd immunity could not possibly be achieved or considered an endgame solution to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic because to get there would require accepting a cost of millions of COVID-19 deaths, with a herd immunity threshold requiring 60% or more of the population to become infected.
Serological studies in Sweden show that no more than 20% of the population in Sweden has been infected so they are very far from herd immunity, Fauci argues!
His position should have completely discredited him as an "expert" because the fallacies underlying his assessment have long been illuminated by the scientific community.
There are two main explanations that I'm aware of for how the herd immunity threshhold could be much lower than the doomsdayers have been saying from the start, which together can explain how it could be that Sweden has already achieved.
The first is that the modelers and other doomsdayers failed to consider individuality in transmission dynamics.
Rather, there is a great deal of heterogeneity in transmission dynamics that Fauci and others have failed to take into account, such that once the pool of those most likely to catch and spread the virus has been sufficiently depleted, the virus will simply not be able to spread so easily anymore because, for whatever reason, most of us do not share the characteristics of the "superspreader".
The second explanation is that there is already some background immunity to SARS-CoV-2.
Whereas Fauci touted studies indicating that most of Sweden's population has no evidence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 as proof that most of its population remain susceptibles, the truth is that an absence of detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies is not evidence of susceptibility to infection.
This is because antibodies are neither always sufficient nor even necessary for immunity, and in the case of SARS-CoV-2, many studies now have shown that cell-mediated immunity, as opposed to antibody or humoral immunity, plays just as important -- or, arguably, an even more important -- role.
Numerous studies have shown that even people who have never been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 may still have some level of cross-protective immunity due to past exposure to common coronaviruses (which are a common cause of common colds worldwide).
That is, the immunity gained by infection with a common-cold-causing virus is not only protective against that particular coronavirus, but, evidently, also against the related coronavirus that causes COVID-19, which, as it turns out, is not nearly so "novel", immunologically, as originally assumed.
As a result of the heterogeneity in transmission dynamics and the existing background immunity, the threshold for achieving natural herd immunity is far lower than the doomsdayers keep claiming.
So those of us who've argued from the start that natural herd immunity is a better strategy than the "lockdown until we can mass vaccinate the global population" endgame have science on our side.
We must stand up and fight the authoritarianism and the fearmongering that is used to manufacture consent for policies that both violate fundamental human rights and cause massive harms.